!!! UPDATE !!!
IT SEEMS MR. WALTMAN IS FIXING EVERYTHING EXCEPT MR. WENTZ’S APT. MR. WALTMAN HAS INFORMED THE TENANT THAT HIS APT WILL NOT BE FIXED UNTIL HE MOVES OUT. SO MR. WENTZ WILL BE FILING A COMPLAINT WITH THE PA CODE OFFICE AS WELL AS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE. BILL WALTMAN HAS HAD EVERY CHANCE TO MAKE THIS RIGHT HE CHOOSES NOT TO SO MR. WENTZ FEELS THIS IS THE ONLY WAY HE CAN GO NOW IS TO GIVE THIS TO THE PA CODE OFFICE FOR THEM TO INSPECT THE BUILDING
WE RECEIVED A COMPLAINT FROM A TENANT WHO HAS BEEN RENTING 445 E. PITT ST FOR 20 YEARS NOW, AND HAS HAD HIS RENT RAISED 4 TIMES OVER THE LAST 15 YEARS, AND THE LANDLORD WILLIAM WALTMAN FROM EVERETT WHICH IS NOT THE LONG TIME AREA CONTRACTOR BILL WALTMAN HAS MADE NO REPAIRS IN THE 15 YEARS SINCE HE HAS OWNED IT, THE TENANTS HAVE COMPLAINED ABOUT THE REPAIRS NEEDED DONE AND HAS GOT NO RESULTS, THEY FEEL THESE APTS ARE VERY DANGEROUS, WE HAVE GIVEN BEDFORD BOROUGH MANAGER JOHN MONTGOMERY COPIES OF THESE VIDEOS AND PICS, IF YOU ARE HAVING THIS SAME PROBLEM PLEASE CONTACT THE BEDFORD COUNTY FREE PRESS AND WE WILL SEE IF WE CAN HELP YOU, AND IF ANYONE HAS ANY IDEAS ON WHAT THESE TENANTS RIGHTS ARE AND WHAT CAN BE DONE PLEASE POST HERE, THIS TENANT DOES NOT HAVE A COMPUTER SO THEY HAVE TO RELY ON US TO GET THEM SOME ANSWERS OR HELP
freepress@bedfordcountyfreepress.com
#1 by Farmer on June 22, 2010 - 8:52 am
Quote
There are different remedies depending on whether the property is leased annually or rented monthly. The only legal remedy for a tenant who does not have a written annual lease is MOVE. There are good tenants and bad as there are good landlords and bad. The best action against a bad landlord is don’t rent from them! The money is the only weapon.
#2 by Susan on May 17, 2010 - 12:54 pm
Quote
Cameraman—Maybe you can go to the courthouse and check on how many properties he has and the addresses, then film them to show readers how the rest of rentals look. I bet they aren’t much better than this one.
He’s just another slumlord buying up cheap properties to rent out, sitting back raking in the $. I hope HUD isn’t paying him any of the rents. I’d check in on THAT, too.
#3 by Susan on May 17, 2010 - 12:46 pm
Quote
Waltman is a joke. Doesn’t he realize he is being watched about this situation? Then he turns around and tells his renter, “I’m not fixing the apartment until you move out”. I am glad to hear he’s being reported, maybe they had better check out the rest of his rental properties while they’re at it, would serve him right for acting like an a$$hole!
Maybe someone watching this unfold can help Mr. Wentz find another apartment anyway. I wouldn’t stay in that place one day, nobody should have to live in such squalor—NOBODY!
#4 by BEDFORD COUNTY FREE PRESS on April 23, 2010 - 7:56 am
Quote
MR. Waltman,
why is mr. wentz so concerned that you are going to run into cameraman in your building?
are you still telling your tenants who they can have visit them. maybe we should set up a meeting so we can explain to you what tenant rights are.
do you still live across from the high school road in everett? maybe we will just pop in on you there
#5 by CAMERAMAN on March 22, 2010 - 7:30 pm
Quote
i got an update on this
i called the tenant and mr. waltman has been looking into repairs within the building. also mr. waltman let me give you some advice. when a tenant pays rent you dont have the right to tell that tenant who can visit him. telling the tenant you dont want the cameraman in your building is not legal. and you keep saying you want that tenant out. if you do that who is going to rent that apt with all the damages?
your best thing is to keep doing what your doing. make a game plan and get the work done. work with mr. wentz not against him. he will work with you after all he has been dealing with you for 14 years now
#6 by RGK on March 22, 2010 - 12:02 pm
Quote
WOW! In 2007 I was looking for an apartment, and it just so happened that Mr. Waltman had an apartment available at the time. The location was ideal for me, in walking distance of everything I was going to need. The apartment however was less than desirable. The steps were a problem being that I have back and knee problems and the price was outrageous for a second floor apartment. I am so glad it had more negative that I decided against it. It was in bad condition then and is now, well words cannot describe it but these pictures do at least in this apartment. But believe me that one that I looked at wasn’t much better.
How can Mr. Waltman blame the tenant for the water stains on the wall that are clearly caused by a leak. How can he blame them for the bathroom walls coming apart and the toilet breaking away from the wall. That is truly unfair. Now if the tenant didn’t call it to his attention that could be a different story but highly unlikely. Why didn’t the landlord hold annual inspections at lease renewal time to make sure that everything was in working condition. What else I find deplorable is now the fact that the land lord is using scare tactics and threatening the tenant of eviction for reporting the conditions. Should they have waited until someone got hurt or a fire to breakout. Having a long time tenant speaks volumes. I would have used that tenant as an asset and asked that they make a list of all the things wrong in the building to be able to make the place a livable and likely place to want to live because it was pleasant. Mr. Waltman had to have been aware of the storage that the tenant was using and if he didn’t want them to, the time to make that known was when he first bought the place, not now. Now only draws attention to the landlord as picking on the tenant. You can’t make new rules midstream Mr. Waltman. You have rights as a landlord, or slumlord. But tenant have a right also. You need to pick your words wisely or they will have a case against you. My advise is to really do honest and noteworthy repairs to your building, yes, it will cost allot. Then get your rental fees in line with everyone else’s around you, draw up a meaningful and fair lease if that is how you rent your units, call a meeting of all your tenants and get everything all on one page. Keep in mind not to make it too difficult for one to pay what you are asking, but don’t take a loss either, keeping in mind the economic times we are living in. As far as the tenant, I feel bad that they were the ones to bring this to light. I think other tenants need to be interviewed as well to see all the conditions in drawing a conclusion to this matter. I can’t wait to see where this will finally end up at. My only hope is that Mr. Waltman swallows his pride and does the right thing.
#7 by CAMERAMAN on March 21, 2010 - 1:17 pm
Quote
he did those things when he first got the place not recent.
i have been in contact with the tenant mr. waltman has told them he should throw them out for reporting this
he is giving the tenant real problems according to the tenant. he has been up on the roof doing some sort of repair job.
if mr. waltman would like to contact us for an interview on his version on why this place is in much needed repairs and it is not getting done he knows how to reach us
#8 by Susan on March 21, 2010 - 1:08 pm
Quote
Cameraman– Is it possible to go back into the building and see if these things were taken care of:
“We have placed new carpeting throughout the apartment as well as a new roof and furnace…. We have repaired the staircase several times….”
It was inevitable the the Waltmans would blame this tenant on problems with the house because of him inviting the Free Press in to videotape.
Blaming the tenant for all the “damages”? Geez, I guess the tenant took a shovel and piled all that snow up around the windows and on the roof to create “problems”, right? That’s a crock of BS if I’ve ever heard.
At least the tenant can prove the Waltmans raised the rent 4 times since they took over ownership of the house. They can’t dispute receipts and letters here. So they show themselves to be liars on that issue, what else are they lying about?
That’s why I think you should go back in and check to see if they’ve done what they claim to have done so far. Too bad we can’t find out who they supposedly hired to do the repairs back in the Fall. I bet that “story” doesn’t check out kosher either.
#9 by The Triping Toad on March 20, 2010 - 6:03 pm
Quote
TENANT-LANDLORD HANDBOOK
II. Repairs
A. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE – LANDLORD OR TENANT?
Written leases sometimes state who is responsible for different kinds of repairs. For example, a tenant who is renting a house, rather than an apartment, may have a lease which states that all minor repairs are the responsibility of the tenant and all major repairs are the responsibility of the landlord.
If the tenant has an oral lease, or a written lease that does not state who is responsible for repairs, the general rule is that the landlord is responsible for all major repairs and repairs necessary because of normal wear and tear. If the tenant caused the damage, the tenant may be responsible for repairing the damage. For example, it a tenant’s child breaks a window, the tenant may have to repair it.
If the lease does not state who has responsibility for a particular repair, the housing code of the city or township may have the answer. In Harrisburg, check with the Bureau of Codes Enforcement (255-6552).
B. WHAT SHOULD THE TENANT DO?
When repairs are needed, the tenant should tell the landlord what is wrong, in writing, and give the landlord a chance to make the repairs. If the tenant has trouble getting the landlord to make the repairs, there are several things the tenant can do
1. Call the City Bureau of Codes Enforcement and request a housing code inspection (see Section III).
2. Terminate the lease and move out.
3. Arrange to have the repairs made himself/herself by a reputable repair person and deduct the cost from the rent. (Warning — this procedure can be dangerous if done without the landlord’s agreement. Read Section C below carefully before using this remedy).
Recent new law in Pennsylvania now allows the tenant to stop paying some or all rent if the landlord does not make necessary repairs. A tenant who withholds rent when a landlord has failed to make necessary repairs may have a good defense it the landlord decides to sue for back rent or eviction, if s/he can prove that the house or apartment is worth only the smaller amount of rent. This new law is called “implied warranty of habitability” and gives tenants more rights than the old law did.
C. REPAIR AND DEDUCT AND IMPLIED WARRANTY OF HABITABILITY
Pennsylvania law allows a tenant to make necessary repairs and deduct the cost of the repairs from the rent under certain circumstances. Under the old law, repair and deduct was allowed in only two situations:
1. The landlord had promised to make repairs but repeatedly failed or neglected to do so.
2. The repair was necessary to prevent further injury to the property.
The old repair and deduct remedy could result in eviction based on non-payment of rent. To avoid eviction for non-payment of rent, the tenant had to show that the landlord consented to the repair. The best protection for the tenant was to get a signed agreement from the landlord authorizing the tenant to make the repair. Then, when the repair was made, the tenant paid the balance of the rent with a copy of a receipt for the repairs. The cost of the repair had to be reasonable and receipts were absolutely necessary.
If the tenant failed to get the consent of the landlord, the landlord could decide to terminate the lease and evict the tenant.
Example: Ms. Adams rented an apartment from Mr. Baker for $150.00 per month. The roof in the apartment developed a leak in April in Ms. Adams’ living room. The rain water that seeped in through the leak was discoloring the walls and warping the wood floor. Ms. Adams called Mr. Baker, but he did not make the repairs. The stains on the wall kept getting bigger, and the floor became more warped. Ms. Adams then sent Mr. Baker a letter saying that if Mr. Baker did not make the repairs within two weeks, she would have the repairs made and deduct the cost from the rent. Ms. Adams heard nothing from Mr. Baker. Ms. Adams called Collins Roofers, a local company with a good reputation, and Mr. Collins made the repairs at a cost of $100.00. Ms. Adams paid Mr. Collins. In her next rent payment, Ms. Adams sent Mr. Baker a copy of her receipt from Mr. Collins plus $50.00. Ms. Adams’ rent for that month was paid in full.
Under the old law, it was not clear whether or not Ms. Adams might be evicted for non-payment of rent or in retaliation for using this procedure against the landlord’s desire.
Under the new “implied warranty of habitability” law, the tenant’s obligation to pay rent and the landlord’s obligation to maintain habitable (safe, sanitary and fit) premises depend upon each other. If the landlord breaks his obligation to keep the premises in a reasonable fit condition, this may relieve the tenant from his obligation to pay part or all of his rent until the landlord makes all necessary repairs. The landlord must be given notice of defects and a reasonable opportunity to make repairs, but he does not have to promise to repair before the tenant withholds rent. The warranty of habitability is required by law in all leases (oral and written). The repair need not be necessary to prevent further in jury to the property to justify the use of the warranty; generally, substantial housing code violations are sufficient. In the above example, Ms. Adams could not be evicted for non-payment of rent it she used the warranty to justify a rent payment of only $50.00.
It is important that the tenant inform the landlord in writing of his/her intention to stop paying all or part of the rent if necessary repairs are not made in a reasonable amount of time. The tenant should keep a copy of the letter and copies of all receipts for repairs. If the landlord decides to sue the tenant for that portion of the rent which was withheld, the tenant will need these records as part of his/her defense.
#10 by CAMERAMAN on March 19, 2010 - 11:30 am
Quote
here is an update
i was called by the tenant and he told us that mr. waltman is starting to get tough on him. he told the tenant that if his stuff in the attic is not removed he was going to throw all of it in the trash.
and mr. waltman is starting to blame the tenant for all the damages that is in the building
sounds to me like mr. waltman is not working with the tenant. i guess it is time to call the state instead of the county
#11 by RGK on March 16, 2010 - 4:31 pm
Quote
Today I notice there was some work going on at this apartment building. All I can say is it is about time. They were actually working on the roof in the back of the building. AMAZING what a little nudge can do to inspire some people to do the right thing. Good going free press.
#12 by CAMERAMAN on March 14, 2010 - 6:58 pm
Quote
mr. waltman,
i followed up on you claims that your tenant was not being truthful about you raising the rent 4 times.
i have several dates for you and follow me if you will. you sent a letter dated july 22, 1996 telling them you are the new owner
i have a receipt dated september 1996 rent pain in full $275
i have a receipt rent paid for month of may 1997 $325
you sent them a letter dated july 2004 raising the rent by 25.00 to $350 a month
you sent them a letter dated november 2007 raising their rent by $50 a month
you sent them a letter dated november 2009 raising the rent by $35 a month. making their rent $435
mr. waltman that is 4 times the rent has been raised. shall i post the receipt and letters?
#13 by Susan on March 12, 2010 - 12:01 pm
Quote
QUOTE: “We had the pleasure of watching the videos of the apartment.”
RESPONSE: This is a sick statement to make, Mrs. Waltman. Of course we know you are being “tongue in cheek”, but really there was no cause for starting out your response in such an undignified manner. Your response in general to this situation isn’t acceptable. Trying to get jabs in on this tenant is uncalled for. You’d have been better off ignoring this article and pretending it didn’t exist than to come on here pointing fingers at everyone and everything else to blame but yourself.
Saying you repaired the staircase “several times”? I don’t believe that. It is evident that it WAS touched one time, and THAT was with DUCT-TAPE, lol. I see no new spindles or wood on that railing that shows evidence of being repaired. There are no broken spindles, so what did the youngster break? They appear to me that they came loose due to structural changes underneath the steps, namely where the bumper-jacks are located.
Your talk is cheap, and so is your pocketbook.
#14 by CAMERAMAN on March 9, 2010 - 1:11 pm
Quote
well i sure hope your going to work with the tenant and not give him a hard time about this, their are many repairs needed to bring this place up to county code, and like i said we are planning on following this story to see what happens
#15 by The Waltmans on March 9, 2010 - 9:55 am
Quote
I do apoligize for attacking the family situation, this was done in haste. I am not making excuses for the conditions in this apartment. The roof is being taken care of and the bannister has caused issues. We are aware of them and are making sure that things are taken care of. This is an older building and we have been making efforts to correct some of the situations that we inherited when we bought the property. The wall will be repaired when the roof is taken care of. Mr. Wentz wasn’t completely truthful in saying that we don’t repond to his calls and that we have raised his rent 4 times. No one is permitted to store items in the basement or attic, although Mr. Wentz and his family have continued to use this space. If he is so unhappy living there, why has he been there for over 20 years?
#16 by RGK on March 9, 2010 - 8:01 am
Quote
Well Mr. Waltman, if you took care of these things, I wouldn’t want you or anyone you hired to fix my place. It is evident that this place is still in dire need of repair. The cheap shot at the family was uncalled for. You are angry because you got caught and they aren’t going to take it anymore.
What you state and what the video reports are two different things so one of you are lying and it isn’t the camera.
The areas you question, attic and basement as not being living areas. Well if they are allowed to store belongings in any of those areas your point is mute. What I saw was concern for all tenants with the steps jacked up. Who is to say how stable that is and it should only be a temporary fix until you get it fixed. Shame on you. And the banister. So now you are going to blame a kid. Doesn’t matter who did it they are very unstable and you need to get them fixed. You know you could have a potential lawsuit if even a visitor comes and falls because of that. It is a law that you have to have railings. So I suggest you really reinforce them or replace them. Duct tape is wonderful stuff but it doesn’t hold real well.
The water down the wall and just pouring in the windows is not something new, you could see the water stains from previous times. You should have had someone shovel the snow off there knowing it was a problem instead of doing nothing. It is also a potential fire hazard, unless you have no electricity in that house.You sir are is what gives landlords a bad name. It is called slum lord.
So what if their utilities are all included. No one should have to live in unsafe conditions. Even if you don’t like them, and to admit to raising their rent for that rat trap. SHAME ON YOU. Well Bill the only thing I can say is : you got caught and now you have some work you really have to do. We will all be watching this story unfold.
#17 by CAMERAMAN on March 8, 2010 - 9:24 pm
Quote
well it looks to me like you need to do even more repairs, and you saying they dont live in the basement is a joke. what does that have to do with bumper jacks holding up the steps??. if you think your apts are up to county code you need to look at your apts closer for they are not even close. you need to also look at the other comments, everybody on here thinks it needs lots of repairs. and what is with bad talking the family? what does that have to do with anything. and you saying other people have rain gutter problems, i am a home owner and have not had rain gutter problems. and even if i did. the melting snow would not go in through my bedroom window down my wall and onto the floor. you really need to do something because everybody is watching the outcome of this issue.
#18 by The Waltmans on March 8, 2010 - 7:23 pm
Quote
We had the pleasure of watching the videos of the apartment. We have placed new carpeting throughout the apartment as well as a new roof and furnace and the repairs to the flu area were taken care of years ago. The pictures in the attic are not a living area for this family as well as the basement. We have repaired the staircase several times, his grandson has broke it several times. This family has caused some issues with the other tenants whom I might add are very content living in the building. The spouting has caused problems not only in that building but with other peoples properties due to the large amount of snow we have received this winter. We have a contractor hired to fix this part of the roof area, but he cannot start until the weather breaks. They were hired back in the Fall. We have tried to work with this family on many issues and always respond as soon as possible to there complaints. We have only raised their rent twice in the 20 years they have lived there. Their rent includes heat, water and sewage as well as trash removal, which they like to accumulate. They have had several unsavory family members living with them from time to time and this has caused several problems which I will not disclose.
#19 by Jimbob on March 4, 2010 - 12:23 am
Quote
sorry, my bad, wrong bill waltman. when this issue first arose i couldn’t imagine that the one i was referring to was one and the same that he would let a property be in such disrepair.
#20 by Bedford County Free Press on March 3, 2010 - 11:35 am
Quote
commonwealth code inspection services, inc on lincoln highway has been notified about this matter, and to correct jimbob this bill waltman is not the same one who is a long time area contractor we have confirmed that with the code office
#21 by sherry on February 28, 2010 - 4:16 pm
Quote
nobody should have to live like this , that’s a total disgrace, call the department of health on them have them come out and take a look they will condemn it
#22 by Jimbob on February 28, 2010 - 12:00 pm
Quote
The code office is on the left going toward bedford in the imler plaza, Marty Steach is the codes enforcement officer but is usually out on the road, Clem Mellot is the other one and he is usually in the office. I don’t know how they may make out though because Waltman is a long time area contractor in the county. And has been discussed previously in different forums in this county its not what you know but who you know….
#23 by MICHELE on February 28, 2010 - 10:05 am
Quote
I can’t believe anyone would expect anyone else to live in conditions like that! I’m sure the landlord doesn’t live like that! He should be doing an inspection on his rental properties from time to time and maybe someone should fill him in on the landlord and tenant act.
By the looks of the pictures the problem with the roof leaking wasn’t just something that happened overnight, it appears to have been going on for some time, I’m sure this man reported the problem before.
I just read on the attorney general’s website that you can file a complaint either by phone or online. If I were this gentleman I would be calling the number below ASAP, maybe they can give him some advice on what to do next.
The website said…If you have a problem or a dispute with a landlord or any other business, you can call the Attorney General’s Bureau of Consumer Protection at 1-800-441-2555, or you can also file an online complaint.
#24 by lucinda on February 28, 2010 - 7:47 am
Quote
Cameraman. This place they are talking about is on Mile Level at the little Imler Plaza. Coming west on 30 it will sit on the left hand side the very last building entrance. It sits a little lower than the rest of the entrances.
#25 by CAMERAMAN on February 28, 2010 - 6:25 am
Quote
where about’s on mile levil is this place, and can you supply a phone number for us to get started
#26 by Jimbob on February 28, 2010 - 12:03 am
Quote
I would say that susan is right about legal aid. But those people may get some satisfaction from the comonwealth code office on mile level. They aren’t in the business of policing for code violations but If you report it to them with the pictures they may help. I guarentee you that those jacks under that stairwell aren’ t legal and those ballisters on that stairway are an accident waiting to happen.
#27 by Susan #2 on February 27, 2010 - 1:30 pm
Quote
Contact MID PENN Legal Services in Bedford. They can tell you what needs to be done. If low income they can help.
address: 232 E Pitt St
Phone: (814) 623-6180
Fax: (814) 623-6180
All Client phone: 1-800-326-9177
Mailing address: P.O. Box 202 Bedford, PA 15522
#28 by CAMERAMAN on February 27, 2010 - 1:04 pm
Quote
welcome back susan i thought the players club got you !
#29 by Susan on February 27, 2010 - 12:51 pm
Quote
This is a real tragedy indeed
Shame on Bill Waltman. Hey Buddy Bill, there’s a hell-of-a-lot more to owning apartment rentals than just sitting back raking in the $ off your rental property. 1st and foremost? Seeing your tenants have SAFE living conditions.
Holy hell-o Rafter, what do you mean by saying,
“Housing is NOT scare in this area”?! Housing certainly IS scarce in this area–for people with LIMITED INCOME. Do you think this guy can afford an apartment for $500-600 like what the better apartments in Bedford are going for? See, this is yet another prime reason why you wouldn’t make a good candidate for Commissioner. You speak out too quickly BEFORE you think through a situation at hand.
Apartments in Everett (above a lot of the stores) are renting out for $300-400 AND they include HEAT, garbage, AND are cleaner and better kept than the likes of this dump! Maybe this tenant should look there for a place to live just to get out of that mess. NOBODY should have to accept living like this! I feel bad for this guy, his demeanor seems broken, like he can do nothing else about the situation but accept the condition.
IDK what the OUTSIDE of this place looks like, but judging by the INSIDE alone, the place needs to be condemned immediately. It looks like the whole place is ready to cave in any day now. I’d like to know how Mr. Waltman insures this place, maybe someone can dig up the company he carries with and report him for allowing the house to become in disrepair. I’m sure he’d have to make improvement or risk the insurance company dropping his policy.
What we need is for someone with $ to build an apartment complex for qualified lower income families. We have enough people in this area that could benefit, and believe me, this rental house isn’t the only one that’s in this bad of shape. Everyone deserves to have a decent place to live that they can AFFORD. It’s so ironic that some of the ‘slum-lords’ of Bedford walk around acting like they are so much in this town, yet own property like this one and put no $ back into them to keep the maintenance up. Would THEY live in some of the places THEY OWN? No way. Yet they are okay renting places like this out to people they know have no other choice. It makes me sick to my stomach how people like this have no feelings of compassion towards their fellow mankind, especially those who have it harder than some of the rest of us.
Maybe someone could contact Skyles Calhoun (or someone like him) and see if they would consider investment in a housing project for our community. Perhaps the government would even step in to give funding for a project such as this.
If we can get people in this town involved in the “beautification of downtown Bedford”, we should be able to find a way to give our own people a decent place to live and raise their kids.
#30 by John Rafter on February 27, 2010 - 10:46 am
Quote
If they are getting a federal housing subsidy there
is probably a way to force the landlord to make needed repairs.
Getting someone from the government to actually provide
enforcement could be an issue with that.
If they are not getting any subsidy they are on their own.
If they are low income and don’t have suitable housing they
need to contact the county assistance office to see if they
can get some type of emergency help.
I don’t think Bedford Borough is going to do anything.
#31 by CAMERAMAN on February 27, 2010 - 5:33 am
Quote
rafter you live in bedford would this fall under the borough forcing the landlord to fix things, and why they dont move ” fixed income ” they really cant afford to pay the security deposit & other extra things you need money for when you move, and housing’s waiting list is at about a year after sign up
#32 by John Rafter on February 27, 2010 - 2:03 am
Quote
Here’s the Landlord/Tenant Law:
http://www.attorneygeneral.gov/uploadedFiles/Consumers/landlord_tenant_act.pdf
#33 by John Rafter on February 27, 2010 - 1:39 am
Quote
The place looks like a dump, why don’t they move out?
Housing is NOT scare in this area.