Free Hit Counter
Free Hit Counter


  1. Ed says:

    Huston , I do not care what you think the banners stand for. The rainbow actually stands for and is a token ,as it appears in the clouds, for the promise God made that He would never again destroy the earth with a flood. (Genesis 9:8-17)KJB . What you think it stands for or what I think it stands for , is irrelevant in this case. The banners are in violation of the codes that are in place right now . They have never been approved by those whose job it is to approve and or enforce those codes . The Bedford Candy shop facade is not in violation of the codes and is also a privately owned building and business. The Anderson House is a Borough building and the borough members that are elected and that represent the people of Bedford , should be more responsible that it abides by the standards , codes and rules that are set for everyone else . Whether or not the banners are “offensive” is also not the primary issue nor the reason the borough should have contacted the business and let them know they are in violation.

  2. Huston says:

    Ed my rainbow flags are no more offensive then the colors on the Bedford Candies facade of yellow and pink. I think you know they are gay pride Ed and I think you doth protest to much. I could truly give 2 s%×&s less what your opinion is. So eff off. As for your statement that they have no historical relevance, have you heard of Stonewall before?

  3. Ed says:

    Why are the people running a business in the Anderson House allowed to violate Bedford’s historic designation and building codes for banner and flag colors ? The colors are tacky . They have no historic relevance. The Anderson House is also NOT a privately owned building but rather a borough owned structure in which case the historic designation should be more fully followed . Why has this been allowed ? Has the borough now agreed not to enforce the codes in place ?


    An interesting question you might ask the Boro Council members at the next meeting, Why was the previous Man who was running the Fort left go, I know why he was left go, but it might be interesting to see if they would tell you the truth. I have my doubts they will.


    I feel it is some what late for Boro Council to start to worry about the inventory of artifacts at the museum, since up to this time, it seems no one on the council seemed to really care about what was there, they have no clue what is missing, nor what was donated years ago.

  6. Dana says:

    The council will do what ever they feel suits their own best interests ..not THE PEOPLES or THE GENERATIONS to come..who will never see change for the better or landmarks that were meant
    for everyone to enjoy


    we will pass that request onto the borough manager

  8. del turner says:

    Could the borough mgr speak louder on the video, it is hard to hear her! Thanks

  9. Carol Scott says:

    Egolf Park was given to the people of Bedford County
    to enjoy. Do not sell it !!!!!restore it. I am tired of this mess so clean it up. I hope with the new leadership that you guys will move ahead for the people. I wish you all a bright future with the park. God bless

  10. Ed says:

    rather , there is no excuse not to do this . That is to keep and maintain the Egolf park for us , its beneficiaries .

  11. Ed says:

    WHAT THE COUNCIL NEEDS TO DO IS DO WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT THEM TO DO , NOTHING ELSE !!!!!!! FIND OUT WHAT THE PEOPLE OF BEDFORD WANT THEM TO DO WITH EGOLF PARK, AND DO IT !!! I believe the vast majority of Bedford residents , want Egolf Park to remain what the donors wanted to be, a park open to the people of Bedford and beyond . In essence this Park is a free use public park that should be maintained for all of these beneficiaries. I believe the judge made a wrong decision and and an appeals court will verify that . Keep the park and maintain it . Use the volunteers to help do it . There is no excuse to do this . The English flag should be sold to the highest bidder and that money given back to the care of the park.

  12. Ed says:

    The Bedford Borough council may have failed its fiduciary responsibility concerning the proper care of Egolf Park for the beneficiary of that park. They should have been looking out for our interests NOT any other group or entity . If Mr. Lemly had connections to an organization that sought taking the park then Mr. Lemly , in my opinion should resign from council because of the conflict of interest . I believe the law process should continue and I pray people in Bedford will help support the Egolf park association to help litigate this further UNLESS the Bedford Borough Council stops its desire to cease their duty to keep and maintain this property for US , teh people of Bedford. WE WANT THIS PARK, DO YOUR DUTY, YOUR fiduciary duty !!!! There are too many obvious things that most can see that should bring an investigation of this . A too cozy judge’s decision does not sit right with many people i know. How could council have ever though to use the tree money from the Park to pay to preserve and keep that old English flag. There are just too many glaring things that do not seem right. JUST STOP TRYING TO GIVE AWAY *OUR* PARK !!!!!!

  13. ichAudrey VanWyk says:

    Egolf Park Associates has been formed to Save this beautiful park for perpetuity! Dave Gasperich is president of the group and any help to defray the mounting legal expenses would be greatly appreciated. This beautiful land, once lost, can not be replaced.

  14. ed says:

    The issue IS the future use for the residents of Bedford and keeping it as our people’s Park as was the written intention and desire of the Egolfs. There was and is no other specific complaint or discriminaiton against any other group or entity as is suggested and even stated as belief by the Humane Society letter . The desire against ANY change to the use of Egolf Park applies to ANY AND ALL other invention or planned alteration of original purpose of the Park. The risks by the Humane Society and costs that would apply to such attempts to alter the original purpose of the Park by seeking ownership of such , should not be laid upon any other but The Bedford County Humane Society. I do not think it sounds proper(not extortion but possibly to intimidate) , that the Humane society would make a request of a “donation” to cover the costs of their legal fees and more , from the group that was and is only intent on keeping what is already ours , Egolf Park for The People of Bedford .

  15. ed says:

    Please do not give away or sell The People of Bedford’s Egolf park .

  16. kelly says:

    dont sell egolf park to the humane society…. GIVE IT TO THE HUMANE SOCIETY

  17. ed says: > This is a site concerning the truth of the dangers and evils of slickwater horizontal natural gas fracking and the people and companies involved with the toxic contamination of what should always be clean , safe, good tasting, drinking water. Don’t let the frackers threaten , intimidate or buy off any of our commissioners, consilmen , representatives or other fellow citizens.

  18. Ed says:

    Let council members give away THEIR OWN LAND NOT THE People’s land.

  19. Ed says:

    Let council members give away THEIR OWN LAND NOT THE People’s land . !!! MOST IN BEDFORD WANT TO KEEP THE PARK !!

  20. Ed says:

    Egolf Park is for the people of Bedford . Let the council members who have a severe conflict of interest on this issue, GIVE THERE OWN LAND TO THE HUMANE SOCIETY . DO NOT STEAL THIS AWAY FROM THE PEOPLE OF BEDFORD AND OUR FUTURE GENERATIONS !!!!!!!

  21. Ed says:

    DO NOT SELL EGOLF PARK !!!!!! or give it away !!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



 photo videographyad-Copy_zps3eee24f5.jpg  photo uptownad-Copy_zps96e6eac8.jpg  photo newbcfpcard-Copy_zps0d627295.jpg  photo scan0001-Copy_zps211d00bb.jpg  photo fcb9ded8-6549-4b7b-9b73-a0e9ca21251f_zps18a7b125.jpg



September 2014
« Aug